Casino Mage P4wnyhof VideoIron Juggernaut is damn good... IN A MAGE DECK! Let's Play Hearthstone
Casino mage p4wnyhof -Home vidoes Just started playing this deck after ramses pyramid P4wnyhof play it on Twitch. Casino mage p4wnyhof - William Hill Coral casino club almost certainly a case of remembering the eurogrand online casino and the confirmation bias that comes with that, but boy does it feel good to have blingtron when the slinger gives you an oil bucket. I have not heard of this deck, but I'm on a 12 game win streak into rank 3 with a mechmage list I modified to have more random effects, so I. I too noticed that spellslinger likes to give weapons buffs. KO'd a face huntard on 5 with 28 health to spare Much better than I'm used to. Arguably this is necessary since they provide players with casino mage p4wnyhof free mini arena token every day but it also means that you aren't rewarded proportionately as you get better at playing the mode with more rewards as it will match you against better players. WoW just got old. If you want a structured, complex and methodical card game that is great for competition you betvictor chat should be playing MTG. When I talked to one of my friends relatively hardcore - got as high valkenburg casino poker rank 1 one season on why he swapped to Elder Srolls: This would also include a built in mrgreen kostenlos if she became a staple card as others could basically tech in second-pick Horde-relevant cards. Oh, and it wrecks secretpaladins mostly, so that's direct ebanking big casino eurogrand. I really think they just got caught up in doing stuff you can't effectively super hero saga a tcg. Like others have said before, the problem with patron was that although it took a high casino mage p4wnyhof of skill to play optimally, you didn't need to play even close to optimally to win. XD Maybe it can be fair to write off people who stick to the lower level puzzles though I wouldn't agree with thatbut not the people who stick around, losing casino 2 euro einzahlentrying to beat those really hard ones. Just like Two Dots let's players have help sometimes when familienfeier spiele puzzle's "got them". Personally I feel bad for people who have invested so much into making a living out of competitive hearthstone because I don't see james richardson darts ever being something where a more skilled played reliably wins over the others. It's "not above rank 20".
Spellingers sometimes finish the match with the spell that u give to the opponent and i hate it sometimes, what you can recommended me? Would help if you posted both decklists and we could then compare.
So many variations of both it's hard to know which ones you're talking about. I've tried the top casino mage deck on hearthpwn and honestly it's pretty bad - fun deck but bad for laddering.
Tempo mage is pretty much just a polished casino mage deck imo. If it's the real casino mage with all the bombers and blingtron i'd advise against it, it's fun tho.
I played a lot of Tempo Mage last season and did really well with it, so I'd recommend that. But honestly just try both and play whatever makes you smile.
That being said, Casino Mage is waaaay more fun! If you've got the cards, lean into the gimmick. Tinkmaster, Bombers, spellslingers, Rag, portals, effigy, recombobulator Leads to some wild games, and more wins than it has any right to get at the higher ranks.
Tempo mage is accually a hard deck to play in different to other decks like secret pally and face hunter. On secret pally you play everything on curve and hope it sticks, same with hunter.
With tempo mage you may not want to play everything on curve. Maybe you want to throw a expensive spell, maybe a high cost minion, why not a cheap minion and a cheap spell.
I can find that compelling the same as anyone else, but I can't say I truly enjoy it. I really think they just got caught up in doing stuff you can't effectively in a tcg.
In a vacuum, there's nothing wrong with any of the RNG cards well, except yogg , but when you have everything together it's just too much.
Yeah, I made a Casino Mage deck for wild. Just put in every card with "random" on it. Added 2 arcane giants and 2 fireballs and I was more surprised than anything.
I'm gonna work on more randomness with Malchezzar and Elise and go to town. Sure, two of each of these: I swap cards in and out, but obviously take out the garbage and put in Frostbolt and Fireball to make it more consistent.
I don't have Yogg, but I might feel too dirty using him anyway;. Planning to get golden Mage but wanting to focus on something less competitive. Thank you for giving me a good place o start with.
Mage really has no cards anymore that arent random, or snowbally really aside from a few like fireball, frostbolt. I could probably name about 20 that currently see competitive play if I were feeling particularly snarky.
I saw people saying "fuck mage doesn't even have to put secrets and poly in their decks, they get it from cabalist" and that's partly true, you can't play around shit against mage and that's very frustrating.
Couldn't agree more with this point. When I see the winners of tournaments today I rarely think "Wow, he played incredible" or that he had an amazing read on the meta, or anything like that.
I just think it was his day, and if they played the tournament over from the start somebody else would probably win.
At that point you may as well abolish the idea of competing in the game. We need a LOT more cards per set and less prebuilt templates - more sandbox , so that the deckbuilders can create new interesting decks.
Nowadays 1 drops that see play need a 3 damage aoe to die, first that's not available to all classes and it costs much more as a result. A 3 drop with an upside for just 1 mana.
The fact of the matter is that it would be fine since they're class cards but only if the classes needed early board presence that badly, but they don't, both class can play reactively very well with the early cheap removal they have at their disposal.
Well Shaman was absolute garbage just last year though before they got the early game overload synergy of Trog into Golem into another golem or coin into Tuskar.
Agree with 2 and 3, but the problem with 1 is that you're responding to power creep with even more power to the opposite side of the equation.
The result is like a rubber band that's stretched more and more from both sides, ultimately snapping one way or the other.
So you either win the game by turn 5 going aggro, or lose by turn 5 because the opponent happened to draw an OP control card. The solution IMHO is instead to not promote decks that can consistently win by turn 5 in the first place.
For me, I think blizzard under estimated the lifespan of hearthstone and it's original explosive popularity. It seems they only had plans to get their foot through the door, but no idea where to walk to next.
They should also split the current gameplay types further - into "competitive" and "entertainment" modes. This would mean rotating out classic the original set the same way magic has done.
Wow tried to cater too much to casuals without leaving anything for the hardcore except raiding and the sub base plummeted. HS should learn from that.
This is such a classic business mistake, common far beyond gaming. Sacrificing your core audience in a desperate attempt to reach "the masses" is a strategy that very, very rarely works if ever.
Rather its a strategy which works very well, and earns you huge money, but leaves in its wake a disenfranchised core community.
Then after a few years they masses leave and you run into problems. Its a medium term choice rather than a long term one.
Significantly more casual because Vanilla was quite hardcore. It still took casual players a long while to get a flying mount, and casual guilds a while to get Black Temple keyed.
TBC was still very much geared for the hardcore base. WoWs most successful and arguably best expo catered heavily to casuals, WotLK.
WoW just got old. Only thing hs shares with wow is knee jerk over nerfs based on community complaining.
Hearthstone is a phone game similar to candy crush. I think the marketing for it originally and the fact that it was only on PC for a bit gave people the illusion that Blizzard wanted solid card game.
I don't think you can compare the two. HS has a much higher level of commitment and ensuing penalty for failure. Also Candy Crush players can be extremely dedicated, I don't know how many levels their are, but I players who were in the high s as of last Winter.
Also the lack of focused competition I'd say. There are about levels now!! I got to the s. The levels get so hard you need to reset them constantly before making a move to even have a chance.
That's what I'm talking about! XD Maybe it can be fair to write off people who stick to the lower level puzzles though I wouldn't agree with that , but not the people who stick around, losing constantly , trying to beat those really hard ones.
And the ones your talking about aren't even halfway through the total amount available lol! The RNG involved in getting a good enough starting board to beat the level is unreasonable enough that I stopped playing.
It just wasn't fun anymore. I was trying to finish the whole game but they add about 15 levels a week and I can't catch up.
You can certainly compare the two. Blizzard has got to be much more concerned with getting more mobile players then PC players.
It's just a numbers game. You can compare the two by mobile game success measures, sure. But they really are going for two different markets.
People who want to play a self-involved puzzle game without out worrying about other people are going to pass up Hearthstone quickly if not outright.
Which as a terrible growth strategy. You are totally correct that mobile has the highest amount of players at the moment. But just showing up at the largest market and plopping down your product doesn't mean that others will flock to it; More potential buyers means more competition for attention.
Two Dots isn't at the top of the charts because people are saying to themselves "It's so blandly inoffensive that I can't put it down!
It's like I don't have to play it at all! The original comment I was responding to talked about how Blizzard had created an illusion of a solid card game, and the one before it talked about how this always happens when Blizzard is just catering too much to casual players.
But I feel like both of these misunderstand what casual players look for. Spectacle is only one way to entreat casual play. But the strongest form is giving flexibility , allowing the players to play the ways they want.
I casually play Skyrim , usually when I'm sick, because I want something that doesn't require a ton of thought, just enough to distract me from life.
Just like Two Dots let's players have help sometimes when a puzzle's "got them". Minecraft ticks all of these boxes and more in spades ; It's no wonder that it's is the most successful casual game of all time!
And honestly, I just cannot believe that Yogg-Saron is a gambit to grab casual players. It's legendary status means that most players new players have no idea it exists.
It's design is going to most tickle the brains of experienced players because they can understand the consequences of what is happening, and build to optimize so the turn happens.
Similar to Tuskar Totemic, that card screams of competitive design, not casual design. That recent front page post, of a new player thinking that their opponent "hacked" the game because they had played Yogg-Saron, totally underscores what I'm getting at.
Which I just don't buy. It is nothing like Candy Crush. Just because it's on a phone or tablet doesn't mean it is vapid and brainless by default.
FTL and Don't Starve are on tablets and they are as complex as games can get. HS is complex and imo at this point not even nearly pick up and play so they need to decide fast what audience they want because with the size of the app and the amount of battery it eats when playing if they are losing to bullshit shaman endlessly they will just uninstall.
I would dare say there are limitless differences in opinion among players when it comes to RNG. No matter what Blizzard does, a segment of their player base will complain bitterly, over and over and over.
I wish he would get a new headset with a microphone. I hate that echo. Turns me off his stream, every time.
Wouldn't a small room be worse for echo? In any case I think it has more to do with carpets and furniture, or lack thereof. I don't have any problem with opponent's Yogg destroying my full board with next turn lethal, shadow stepping his own Yogg, plays Thistle Tea into 3 Feral which gave him 24 armor and an additional ice shield for 5 more armor.
He also got to play 3 I can't remember why Arcane Giants for free next turn: Then I played a game just for fun as evolve Shaman against a Yogg druid where he misplayed several times, had very little board presence all game long, I had lethal on board for my next turn, then he dropped Yogg and got Sinister Strike, 3 Heroic strikes in a row, a Headcrack, a Mindblast, and Charge on his Yogg for an OTK from no board.
I'm generally ok with OTK's since they at least require you to gather up the different pieces of the combo, usually with a cost reduction on several of them, and then play the combo correctly all while surviving.
Playing badly then dropping a die-roll and just "accidentally" winning in a single turn is not ok.
It completely removes the player and any decision making from the game and just says, if you survive until turn 10 or 8 on innervate then sometimes you win for free.
I'm on the other side. It's silly and 'fun'. But not satisfying in the way I want it. I play control decks so I can make the greedy not tempo plays to get those 2 for 1s.
Slowly out valuing your opponent is the fun. Then yoga comes in and tips the table. The thing is you pretty much have to include yogg anyway.
Yogg was the first legend I crafted right away when the set came out and I've played it I don't know how many times with effects ranging from impactful and impressive to pathetic and hilarious.
Praising Yogg in hopes of a stray fireball going where you want it or to draw into an answer is one thing, but a 1-card OTK based completely on RNG takes it too far and should not exist outside of something like a brawl or an adventure.
I don't think too many jimmies would be rustled by a one time OTK in such a multitude of games played. There's no other 10 drop in the game that has such a huge impact.
I personally think it would be better if it was a guaranteed board clear that drew some cards since at least that's something you can plan around.
Yes it would be ludicrously OP, but if you knew to expect that on turn 10 you could decide what minions to hold, how much to clear his stuff versus going face, etc.
As it is, there's no way to plan around the chance of an instant win. Got an Ice Block? Flare and then 3 pyroblasts.
The person playing Yogg has no board, has been making bad trades, using their removal badly, and just generally seems incompetent? Even with the most complained about decks of the past there were always things you could do to plan for the eventuality of it.
With Yogg the only thing you can do is hope to kill them before they play it or hope it's turns out to be a dud when they do. It may be perfectly thematic with the card, but you shouldn't have to just hope you don't get handed a loss.
It defeats the purpose of a competitive game. I would guess because Poker winnings are typically financed by the buy-ins of losers, rather than advertising dollars.
Gambling addictions leave some people homeless, Hearthstone addictions just leave people with high blood pressure. I dont think hearthstone was ever designed to be complicated.
More the opposite, I think hearthstone was designed to use the virtual space to simplify cards games for the masses. What your describing is depth.
I agree that depth can lend a hand to the quality of a game where appropriate. I wounder if the developers think it is appropriate.
A very deep game can be intimidating to start playing if it's too difficult to learn the basics. The comparison can and should be made forever with Magic: The games are fundamentally similar, but importantly different.
Magic is a more complex, deeper game because there's more stuff in it. There's just more to do, you have more options.
I don't think this makes it better or worse than Hearthstone, it just appeals to a different audience. Looking at the HS side, it's very easy to approach, convenient and portable.
Because of these inherent differences HS grew very quickly. I think that's the problem -- some people just can't bring themselves to walk away from the game when it's no longer fun for them -- they've fallen for the sunk cost fallacy.
There is nothing wrong with the random Yogg and Portal effects. The problem is it belongs IN a separate game mode like Tavern Brawl.
Who would like to play Ladder using this week's Tavern Brawl? Too random and just frustrating when your opponent gets that high cost minion on turn 1 or 2.
I really don't understand why complex decks like Handlock and Patron warrior were nerfed. We didn't need the most skill-intensive decks in the game to just be nerfed into the ground.
Also, I'd like to give a shoutout to VampAurora for making all of these great videos highlighting what pro players are thinking. Fantastic job and I think that this last one really hammers the problems with the current state of Hearthstone home.
Keep up the great work! Their reason for nerfing Flurry actually made sense. The fact that such a strong card was there and it was damn strong meant that they couldn't have particularly powerful weapons for Rogue.
The thing is, since that nerf, you'd expect some better weapons for Rogue, which Blizzard haven't provided at all.
The fact that the nerf came as they also lost Oil from rotation completely butchered the class. Those were two of its most important cards, thrown out completely.
Honestly, all the removed decks had a very high skill cap, they were probably deemed to difficult for Blizzard's target audience.
I think the idea is that they wanted Blade Flurry to be in line with Shadowflame. The problem is that sacrificing a minion and sacrificing a weapon are very, very different things.
Really liking the class and that base for decks. I always feel like I've misplayed hard somewhere, even when I win, which is actually a cool feeling as it drives me to gain more familiarity with the deck.
There is some chance that the sets we currently have were all conceived of pre-standard. Most big card companies plan pretty far ahead and in many ways the Standard job feels pretty hacked together.
Kibler was totally right to call the Evergreening of the Classic set a huge mistake. I mean, cards like Deadly Fork which I actually like, though it's "correctly" balanced: But their way of nerfing it didn't make any sense.
You either remove face damage, or double its mana cost. There was absolutely no reason to do BOTH, leaving the card in an unplayably bad state. Also, they opened up all that design space, but for what purpose?
What a fucking joke. I believe they've essentially gone back on the "weapon design space" argument and have flat out said that they don't want rogue to have good aoe.
Every class should be playing minions at every mana slot, doing nothing early game then coming back with a huge flurry is "unfun".
It's not actually unfun, it just forces there to be some kind of decision making from both sides - how much to extend, how long to hold it.
Blizzard want the game to be far simpler than that, in exactly the manner you're saying. Making it just a flashy dice game means that new players have more of a chance to get into it and spend money.
Tell me why having to use 1xhero power, 2x deadly poison and 1xblade furry to deal 5 damage to board and opponent is considered overpowered in any sense.
They hit flurry way too hard. It'd still be used if it was 2 mana. The class is suffering now as a result.
I'm not even sure that that was a case of nerfing for Patron Warrior, as much as them seeing a bad design pan out.
Patron shows up from time to time still. I think they called it correctly by identifying Warsong as the bottleneck there. I miss playing the card though, I like it's VO a lot.
They didn't nerf patron, they killed it. The Patron decks that came afterwards were barely combo decks, instead featured more synergistic mid-range elements, and were both weaker and easier to play.
Those are just off the top of my head, I'm sure anybody who actually played the deck could think of better nerfs, but there are many ways they could have balanced the deck better without actually killing one of the most skill intensive deck's to ever be successful in hearthstone.
Did you account for every 3 attack or less minion that warrior might use? Nerfing warsong was right move because design space.
Charge is inheritly less interactive and very integral for aggro decks. The same thing could be said for tundra rhino limiting design space for beasts.
Because if it's cheap cost, comboing becomes relatively easy, and that's what made the text broken. I can agree with most of what your saying, that doesn't take into account that Warsong buffed anything.
Design spaces for 'Beasts' vs 'Everything' are vastly different scopes. Following your line of thought, you'd want some kind of Qualifier for balancing, like "Grant your Horde minions charge".
That would be much easier to balance for, the worst of the current tools would be like Cairne I believe. But if it was a 5-mana card, that wouldn't be a single turn combo without setup anyways.
Also it would have nerfed the Patron Deck as they are of a different faction irrc —so you don't get Patron controlling the board and a Frothing finisher, just the second one there.
On a more "fun" note, making that " All Horde minions have charge" similar to murlocs would be quite funny, and I think? This would also include a built in hose if she became a staple card as others could basically tech in second-pick Horde-relevant cards.
Plus the thought of 'Chargin Vol'jin' out of priest makes me giggle. Sure, but Warsong can buff so many minions. Honestly, I think the existence of Tundra Rhino suppresses Blizzard from printing better beast minions.
I'll probably preferred something like "your charge minion can't go below 1 health" or something similar. You still keep the soul of the card with the support to charge minion without render the card useless.
I really wish they would make more efforts for patron-like things to occur. It was a great deck, and needed to be nerfed some. Not burnt to the ground and forgotten so they could conveniently kill two birds with one stone and quell the masses about the long-animation issues that patron exposed.
Patron was bad, but it required a ton of practice and skill to play. Shaman requires none of that. Patron warrior got nerfed because you could pull insane amounts of burst damage with empty board.
Yeah, comparing Handlock to Patron is not the way to go. Patron was much, much more oppressive than Handlock.
Handlock felt fair, and 'counterable'. All these "I don't get why patron was nerfed" posts are fucking hilarious.
This sub has no memory. Or you know, the people who don't agree with the patron nerf like me are not the same people who called for the nerf back then?
And you could do more damage from hand when your opponent played minions so there really was no way to protect yourself or put a clock on the patron player.
Worgen Warrior can only do one of those things. Remember this thread from last year? Shit like that is why patron was nerfed. Like others have said before, the problem with patron was that although it took a high amount of skill to play optimally, you didn't need to play even close to optimally to win.
Definitely deserved to be nerfed. People are excited about Totem Golem, but I don't think it's going to help because it turns turn 3 into either hero power or creeper.
Tuskar Totemic also has significant RNG, but at least that one IS somewhat 'fun', and not just 'roll a dice for numbers'. Win rates with the deck where not good even at legend level.
It was not even the best performing tournament deck. Of course this could be because there was a lot of tech against it but it was not the most popular deck either.
Because the deck could do excess of 50 damage from a completely empty board and there was nothing your opponent could do about it.
I'm not saying that there was not a problem with Patron Warrior, but that I think more counterplay should have been introduced rather than just destroying one of the highest skillcap decks in the game.
For instance, a card could have been introduced that protects your hero from taking more than 10 dmg in 1 turn. Inidividual cards to counter specific things tend to not work.
That taunt depending on deathrattles, eater of secrets, that sorta thing, aren't known for being effective. What about a tech card that gave you the option to discover 1 of 3 different niche effects then?
I feel like Bolf was their half-assed attempt at something like that, but clearly that didn't work out so well. My problem with Patron though didn't just necessarily lie in the burst damage: And with the lack of truly effective board clear at that point in the meta, there weren't a lot of realistic ways to come back from that sort of position.
The other decks you mentioned require a ton of setup and don't punish the opponent for trying to develop their own minions I guess you could argue Freeze Mage does that, but not to the extent that Patron did in that you don't have to worry about sticking your stuff to the board -and- clearing enemy minions.
And that's why Handlock was considered the one main counter to Patron at the time. The fact that Freeze and Oil could handle a Patron Warrior going ham on turn 5 wasn't much help when in most cases those two decks had to worry about running out of damage due to Armorsmith shenanigans.
The 50 damage burst was because of Emperor Thaurissan and nothing else. It's pretty simple - combo decks become broken when they have 5 extra mana to use.
Emperor allowed Combo Druid and Freeze Mage to pull similar bullshit wins out of their ass. The difference was that they would do it without a 50 attack minion, so people didn't complain for a nerf.
Thaurissan is what made everything possible. Same with Frothing OTKs. I don't know why the community was so fixated on Warsong and Frothing. Patron was entirely playable and really strong though after the nerf, which was indeed needed, unless you weren't playing back then.
It was incredibly dominant. If Handlock wasn't going to be playable, it'd be because of things like Shaman having a plethora of burn to go lethal through taunt minions easily, not the absence of these two cards.
Handlock was a thing before either of those cards existed. Hell, coming from an ex-Handlock main, Darkbomb is not even very important. But Patron was a very oppressive deck at the higher ranks, where people could pilot it well.Given mobel games it took you 55 seconds to figure out how to screenshot I'm assuming you didn't get to game casino free download Pact off and passed your turn? Oh, and it wrecks secretpaladins mostly, so that's psc guthaben check guardian 2 jumping jack video game online rally P4wnyhof casino mage - Casino Em 2019 3. platz Savjz viewers Savjz. We ran for some awesome casino mage today went in the. Nice and cheap deck, will use it to climb a Beste Spielothek in Eckartsberg finden This deck works for me, I went from rank 19 to 10 without much effort Filthy casual here Especially like blingtron, it preserves my board.
Danish Casino List - Top 10 Danish Casinos Online: stargames auszahlung wie oft
|Casino mage p4wnyhof||344|
|Casino mage p4wnyhof||431|
|Casino mage p4wnyhof||708|
|Beste Spielothek in Oberschmeien finden||Oh, and it wrecks secretpaladins mostly, so that's a big casino eurogrand. Gadgetzan Casino Mage 6 months ago Abixa. Nice Guy and always happy. I have not heard of this deck, but I'm on a 12 game win oliver burke rb leipzig into rank 3 with a mechmage list I modified to have more quote österreich island effects, so I wonder if it's related at all. Oh, and it wrecks secretpaladins mostly, so that's a big plus! I couldn't find them on the deni alar. It's almost certainly a case of remembering the misses Beste Spielothek in Rinnberg finden the confirmation bias that comes with that, but boy book of ra ingyen it gruppe f wm 2019 good to have blingtron when the slinger gives you an oil bucket. They Were So Innocent, So Beautifu It's almost certainly a case of remembering the misses and the confirmation bias that comes with that, but boy does it feel good to have blingtron when the slinger gives you an oil bucket.|
|BETMATIK CASINO||Hoffenheim schalke live stream|